<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Constitution Archives - Total War Tactical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/tag/constitution/</link>
	<description>&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Firearm Parts &#124; Accessories &#124; Tactical Gear &#124; Clothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Severe Ammo Purchasing Laws Pushed in Hawaii</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/severe-ammo-purchasing-laws-pushed-in-hawaii/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=5425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a move that mimics California&#8217;s restrictive ammo purchasing, Hawaii lawmakers is following suit. &#8220;This legislation would mandate that an ammunition buyer proves to an ammunition seller that they own a registered firearm in the caliber they are seeking to purchase each and every time they buy ammunition. A firearm owner would have to show [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/severe-ammo-purchasing-laws-pushed-in-hawaii/">Severe Ammo Purchasing Laws Pushed in Hawaii</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move that mimics California&#8217;s restrictive ammo purchasing, Hawaii lawmakers is following suit.</p>
<p>&#8220;This legislation would mandate that an ammunition buyer proves to an ammunition seller that they own a registered firearm in the caliber they are seeking to purchase each and every time they buy ammunition. A firearm owner would have to show their firearms registration along with another form of government-issued photographic ID in order to complete the purchase.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2020/03/aloha-to-freedom-hawaii-lawmakers-push-severe-ammo-restrictions/">https://www.ammoland.com/2020/03/aloha-to-freedom-hawaii-lawmakers-push-severe-ammo-restrictions/</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/severe-ammo-purchasing-laws-pushed-in-hawaii/">Severe Ammo Purchasing Laws Pushed in Hawaii</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia House lawmakers move forward with &#8216;Assault Weapons&#8217; Gun Control Ban</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/virginia-house-lawmakers-move-forward-with-assault-weapons-gun-control-ban/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=5327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Passing by the slim margin, Virginia lawmakers passed HB 961 to the Senate for vote. This measure is to ban the sale of &#8216;assault style&#8217; weapons. Democrats in the Virginia Senate only have a 2 seat lead meaning they can only afford to lose one vote should all the Republicans oppose the bill. Supporters say [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/virginia-house-lawmakers-move-forward-with-assault-weapons-gun-control-ban/">Virginia House lawmakers move forward with &#8216;Assault Weapons&#8217; Gun Control Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passing by the slim margin, Virginia lawmakers passed HB 961 to the Senate for vote. This measure is to ban the sale of &#8216;assault style&#8217; weapons. Democrats in the Virginia Senate only have a 2 seat lead meaning they can only afford to lose one vote should all the Republicans oppose the bill.</p>
<p>Supporters say the proposed legislation is a response to mass shootings. Seven other states already have laws prohibiting assault-style weapons, including New York and California.</p>
<p>More info: <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/virginia-house-approves-assault-weapons-ban">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/virginia-house-approves-assault-weapons-ban</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/virginia-house-lawmakers-move-forward-with-assault-weapons-gun-control-ban/">Virginia House lawmakers move forward with &#8216;Assault Weapons&#8217; Gun Control Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats on Capitol Hill propose a mandate that handgun purchases require a permit</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/democrats-on-capitol-hill-propose-a-mandate-that-handgun-purchases-require-a-permit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=3160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The legislation, backed by Dems in both the House and Senate, would encourage more states to adopt licensing schemes like Connecticut’s handgun purchasing law, which requires a special renewable permit to purchase any revolver or pistol. Dubbed the Handgun Purchaser Licensing Act, the bill was introduced by U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/democrats-on-capitol-hill-propose-a-mandate-that-handgun-purchases-require-a-permit/">Democrats on Capitol Hill propose a mandate that handgun purchases require a permit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legislation, backed by Dems in both the House and Senate, would encourage more states to adopt licensing schemes like Connecticut’s handgun purchasing law, which requires a special renewable permit to purchase any revolver or pistol. Dubbed the Handgun Purchaser Licensing Act, the bill was introduced by U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy of Connecticut along with U.S. Reps. Jahana Hayes, D-Conn and Jamie Raskin, D-Md.</p>
<p>Full story here: <a href="https://www.guns.com/news/2019/06/17/dems-push-mandatory-permits-for-handgun-purchases" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.guns.com/news/2019/06/17/dems-push-mandatory-permits-for-handgun-purchases</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/democrats-on-capitol-hill-propose-a-mandate-that-handgun-purchases-require-a-permit/">Democrats on Capitol Hill propose a mandate that handgun purchases require a permit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast Facts on California &#8220;Bullet-Button Assault Weapon&#8221; Registration</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/fast-facts-on-california-bullet-button-assault-weapon-registration/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=1169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How many Californians tried to register their firearms as &#8220;bullet-button assault weapons&#8221; before the July 1 deadline? How long will it take DOJ to process those registrations? How much did it cost Californians? See some of our research and findings below for the answers. FAST FACTS DOJ had approved 6,213 individuals to register 12,519 firearms as of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/fast-facts-on-california-bullet-button-assault-weapon-registration/">Fast Facts on California &#8220;Bullet-Button Assault Weapon&#8221; Registration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many Californians tried to register their firearms as &#8220;bullet-button assault weapons&#8221; before the July 1 deadline? How long will it take DOJ to process those registrations? How much did it cost Californians? See some of our research and findings below for the answers.</p>
<p><strong>FAST FACTS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>DOJ had approved 6,213 individuals to register 12,519 firearms as of June 30, 2018</li>
<li>DOJ processed 2,723 applications for firearm registration between Aug. 3, 2017, and Jan. 4, 2018</li>
<li>DOJ processed 12,168 applications for firearm registration between Jan. 5, 2018, and June 30, 2018</li>
<li>DOJ still had 52,443 applications for firearm registration pending as of June 30</li>
<li>Based on the rate of their application processing between January and May 2018, it would take DOJ 2.15 more years to finish processing the remaining “assault weapon” applications</li>
<li>The “assault weapon” registration system was originally estimated to cost DOJ $55,770 – 429 man-hours at $130.00 per hour – but over $113,370 was spent on programming alone to add DOJ’s BBAW system into its CFARS system</li>
<li>$119,970 in fees had been collected from gun owners through May 30, 2018</li>
<li>DOJ received funding to hire 24 analysts and two managers to process “bullet-button assault weapon” registration applications – “limited term positions that will cease to exist one year after these employees’ start dates.”</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: https://www.firearmspolicy.org/california-bbaw-registration-key-facts-stats</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/fast-facts-on-california-bullet-button-assault-weapon-registration/">Fast Facts on California &#8220;Bullet-Button Assault Weapon&#8221; Registration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. 9th Circuit Court Upholds Decision to Block California’s Magazine Ban</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/u-s-9th-circuit-court-upholds-decision-to-block-californias-magazine-ban/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=1040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FAIRFAX, Va. &#8212; A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit issued a ruling in the case of Duncan v. Becerra on Tuesday upholding a lower court’s decision to suspend enforcement of California’s restriction on the possession of magazines that hold 10 rounds or more. “This is a significant win for law-abiding gun owners in California,” [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/u-s-9th-circuit-court-upholds-decision-to-block-californias-magazine-ban/">U.S. 9th Circuit Court Upholds Decision to Block California’s Magazine Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAIRFAX, Va. &#8212; A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit issued a ruling in the case of Duncan v. Becerra on Tuesday upholding a lower court’s decision to suspend enforcement of California’s restriction on the possession of magazines that hold 10 rounds or more.</p>
<p>“This is a significant win for law-abiding gun owners in California,” said Chris W. Cox, executive director, National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action. “This unconstitutional law criminalizes mere possession of many standard capacity magazines and would instantly turn many law-abiding gun owners into criminals.”</p>
<p>California Rifle and Pistol Association lawyers, with the support of the NRA, sought an injunction against the magazine possession ban, arguing the law violated the Second Amendment as well as Americans’ due process rights. A federal district court judge agreed and issued a preliminary injunction before the law was set to go into effect. California appealed the decision.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, the 9th Circuit upheld the injunction.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in the trial court, a motion for summary judgment is pending and a ruling on the merits of the case is expected soon. Regardless of the outcome, the case will most certainly be appealed again to the 9th Circuit. By that time, the Supreme Court will likely have a new justice who respects the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the Second Amendment.</p>
<p>“Tuesday’s ruling was a step in the right direction. The National Rifle Association will continue to fight for the rights of Californians to protect themselves,” Cox concluded.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180717/federal-court-upholds-decision-to-block-california-s-magazine-ban">https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180717/federal-court-upholds-decision-to-block-california-s-magazine-ban</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/u-s-9th-circuit-court-upholds-decision-to-block-californias-magazine-ban/">U.S. 9th Circuit Court Upholds Decision to Block California’s Magazine Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey lawmakers OK, send to governor 6 new gun bills</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/new-jersey-lawmakers-ok-send-to-governor-6-new-gun-bills/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 18:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>TRENTON, N.J. (AP) &#8211; Declaring it New Jersey’s response to a national crisis, lawmakers on Thursday sent a half-dozen measures tightening the state’s already-strict gun control laws to Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy’s desk. The Democratic governor said he would sign the bills, establishing some of the “toughest gun laws in the nation.” The Democratic-led Senate [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/new-jersey-lawmakers-ok-send-to-governor-6-new-gun-bills/">New Jersey lawmakers OK, send to governor 6 new gun bills</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRENTON, N.J. (AP) &#8211; Declaring it New Jersey’s response to a national crisis, lawmakers on Thursday sent a half-dozen measures tightening the state’s already-strict gun control laws to Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy’s desk.</p>
<p>The Democratic governor said he would sign the bills, establishing some of the “toughest gun laws in the nation.”</p>
<p>The Democratic-led Senate approved the bills that began advancing after a fatal high school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people dead in February.</p>
<p>“This is our response to our national crisis,” said Democratic state Sen. Richard Codey, who served as governor from 2004 to 2006. “We need national legislation.”</p>
<p>Murphy wrote on Twitter Thursday night that he would sign the bills on Wednesday. He campaigned on a promise for more “sensible” gun control laws.</p>
<p>Source: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/7/new-jersey-lawmakers-set-to-vote-on-6-gun-control-/</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/new-jersey-lawmakers-ok-send-to-governor-6-new-gun-bills/">New Jersey lawmakers OK, send to governor 6 new gun bills</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Office of Administrative Law Approves Controversial Firearm Registration Rule</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/california-office-of-administrative-law-approves-controversial-firearm-registration-rule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Office of Administrative Law has expanded rules on assault weapons and bullet buttons and requires all owners to register their firearms by July 18 through the California Firearms Application Reporting System. Each registration has a $15 fee and requires uploaded digital photos  of the magazine release, both sides of the receiver and barrel. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/california-office-of-administrative-law-approves-controversial-firearm-registration-rule/">California Office of Administrative Law Approves Controversial Firearm Registration Rule</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Office of Administrative Law has expanded rules on assault weapons and bullet buttons and requires all owners to register their firearms by July 18 through the California Firearms Application Reporting System. Each registration has a $15 fee and requires uploaded digital photos  of the magazine release, both sides of the receiver and barrel. Crafters who produce their own will have to apply for a serial number before completion.</p>
<p>Full Story: http://www.guns.com/2017/08/03/new-california-assault-weapon-regs-approved-lawsuits-promised/</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/california-office-of-administrative-law-approves-controversial-firearm-registration-rule/">California Office of Administrative Law Approves Controversial Firearm Registration Rule</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Upholds San Diego, Los Angeles and the San Francisco Ruling Prohibiting Conceal Carry Rights</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/supreme-court-upholds-san-diego-los-angeles-and-the-san-francisco-ruling-prohibiting-conceal-carry-rights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conceal Carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This latest case seems to indicate that the individual&#8217;s right to bear arms is quite limited indeed. The Supreme Court did not oppose a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which held last year that the “2nd Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/supreme-court-upholds-san-diego-los-angeles-and-the-san-francisco-ruling-prohibiting-conceal-carry-rights/">Supreme Court Upholds San Diego, Los Angeles and the San Francisco Ruling Prohibiting Conceal Carry Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-456 alignleft" src="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" srcset="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-500x281.jpg 500w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-64x36.jpg 64w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-600x338.jpg 600w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>This latest case seems to indicate that the individual&#8217;s right to bear arms is quite limited indeed.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court did not oppose a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which held last year that the “2nd Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.”</p>
<p>Get the full story here: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-handguns-california-20170626-story.html">http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-handguns-california-20170626-story.html</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/supreme-court-upholds-san-diego-los-angeles-and-the-san-francisco-ruling-prohibiting-conceal-carry-rights/">Supreme Court Upholds San Diego, Los Angeles and the San Francisco Ruling Prohibiting Conceal Carry Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Appeals Court Blocks D.C. Gun Control Measure</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/federal-appeals-court-blocks-d-c-gun-control-measure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conceal Carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down a District of Columbia gun-control measure that the court said is essentially an outright ban of the Second Amendment. Get the complete story: HERE</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/federal-appeals-court-blocks-d-c-gun-control-measure/">Federal Appeals Court Blocks D.C. Gun Control Measure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down a District of Columbia gun-control measure that the court said is essentially an outright ban of the Second Amendment.</p>
<p>Get the complete story: <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/07/25/appeals-court-blocks-dcs-concealed-carry-law-on-second-amendment-grounds.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HERE</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/federal-appeals-court-blocks-d-c-gun-control-measure/">Federal Appeals Court Blocks D.C. Gun Control Measure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Close To Passing Bill Allowing Firearm Seizures Without Due Process</title>
		<link>https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/oregon-close-to-passing-bill-allowing-firearm-seizures-without-due-process/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwartactical.com/?p=455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Oregon is just one step away from passing an Extreme Risk Protection Order Bill, which can immediately force the subject of the order to hand over all firearms, as well as concealed carry permits. It does not require the gun owner to be present for part of the hearing in which the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/oregon-close-to-passing-bill-allowing-firearm-seizures-without-due-process/">Oregon Close To Passing Bill Allowing Firearm Seizures Without Due Process</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-456 alignleft" src="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" srcset="https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-500x281.jpg 500w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-64x36.jpg 64w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution-600x338.jpg 600w, https://www.totalwartactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Constitution.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>It appears that Oregon is just one step away from passing an Extreme Risk Protection Order Bill, which can immediately force the subject of the order to hand over all firearms, as well as concealed carry permits. It does not require the gun owner to be present for part of the hearing in which the judge decides whether guns should be taken.</p>
<p>Senate Bill 719 co-sponsored by Sen. Brian Boquist (R-Dallas) reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>Creates process for obtaining extreme risk protection order prohibiting person from possessing deadly weapon when court finds that person presents risk in near future, including imminent risk, of suicide or causing injury to another person.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Sources:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/oregon_sb_719">https://www.firearmspolicy.org/oregon_sb_719</a></p>
<p><a href="https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2017R1/Measures/Overview/SB0719">https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2017R1/Measures/Overview/SB0719</a></p>
<p><a href="http://gov.oregonlive.com/bill/2017/SB719/">http://gov.oregonlive.com/bill/2017/SB719/</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youngcons.com/1-bill-gun-confiscation-without-knowledge/">https://www.youngcons.com/1-bill-gun-confiscation-without-knowledge/</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com/news/oregon-close-to-passing-bill-allowing-firearm-seizures-without-due-process/">Oregon Close To Passing Bill Allowing Firearm Seizures Without Due Process</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.totalwartactical.com">Total War Tactical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
